BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

KASPERSKY LABS LIMITED

Company number: 04249748

Reporting period:
1 July 2020 to 31 December 2020


Warning This information is as reported by the business, and responses are in their own words.

This report was filed on 29 January 2021

and approved by Svetlana Ivanova

Payment statistics

Average time taken to pay invoices: 27 days

Invoices paid:

Invoices due but not paid within agreed terms: 31 %

Payment terms

Shortest standard payment period

30 days

Longest standard payment period

46 days

Standard payment terms

Kaspersky standard contractual length for payment of invoices is 30 days, shortest payment terms are immediate terms and agreed with one supplier.

Were there any changes to the standard payment terms in the reporting period?

No

Maximum contractual payment period agreed

30 days

Maximum terms for contractual payment and any changes to standard payment terms – as stated in
contract.

Any other information about payment terms

N/A

Dispute resolution process

Kaspersky endeavour to resolve all disputes in a fair and timely manner. Disputes are generally sought to be resolved by discussion and agreement with the supplier and managed by AP team.

Other payment information

Has this business signed up to a code of conduct or standards on payment practices? If so, which?

For example, signatories to The Prompt Payment Code must commit to paying 95% of their invoices within 60 days.

No

Does this business offer e-invoicing in relation to qualifying contracts? This is where suppliers can electronically submit and track invoices. It’s not just allowing suppliers to email them an invoice.

Yes

Does this business offer supply chain finance? This is where a supplier who has submitted an invoice can be paid by a third-party finance provider earlier than the agreed payment date. The business would then pay the finance provider the invoiced sum.

No

Under its payment practices and policies, can this business deduct sums from payments under qualifying contracts as a charge for remaining on a supplier list?

No

During the reporting period, did the business deduct sums from payments as a charge for remaining on a supplier list?

No