BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

LIGHTBODY OF HAMILTON LIMITED

Company number: SC064691

Reporting period:
1 July 2017 to 31 December 2017


Warning This information is as reported by the business, and responses are in their own words.

This report was filed on 4 July 2018

and approved by Lawrence Trist

Payment statistics

Average time taken to pay invoices: 55 days

Invoices paid:

Invoices due but not paid within agreed terms: 48 %

Payment terms

Shortest standard payment period

20 days

Longest standard payment period

90 days

Standard payment terms

The business’s standard payment terms are 60 days from date of invoice, with the longest, negotiated contractual payment period of 90 days from date of invoice. There were no changes to the business’s standard payment terms during the period.

Were there any changes to the standard payment terms in the reporting period?

No

Maximum contractual payment period agreed

90 days

Any other information about payment terms

N/A

Dispute resolution process

Disputes related to payments are raised with Accounts Payable.

Other payment information

Has this business signed up to a code of conduct or standards on payment practices? If so, which?

For example, signatories to The Prompt Payment Code must commit to paying 95% of their invoices within 60 days.

No

Does this business offer e-invoicing in relation to qualifying contracts? This is where suppliers can electronically submit and track invoices. It’s not just allowing suppliers to email them an invoice.

No

Does this business offer supply chain finance? This is where a supplier who has submitted an invoice can be paid by a third-party finance provider earlier than the agreed payment date. The business would then pay the finance provider the invoiced sum.

No

Under its payment practices and policies, can this business deduct sums from payments under qualifying contracts as a charge for remaining on a supplier list?

No

During the reporting period, did the business deduct sums from payments as a charge for remaining on a supplier list?

No