RAYMOND JAMES WEALTH MANAGEMENT LIMITED
Company number: 01903304
Reporting period:
1 October 2025 to 31 March 2026
Report filed on:
30 April 2026
Approved by:
Francesca Hampton
Contracts and payments
Do any of this business's construction contracts with its suppliers include retention clauses? Yes
Payment statistics
Average time taken to pay invoices: 36 days
Total value paid:
- within 30 days: £28,830,988 (66%)
- in 31 to 60 days: £9,792,446 (22%)
- in 61 days or more: £5,116,341 (12%)
Invoices paid:
- within 30 days: 70%
- in 31 to 60 days: 18%
- in 61 days or more: 12%
Late and disputed:
- total value of payments due in the reporting period which have not been paid within the agreed period: £1,546,212
- payments due in the reporting period which have not been paid within the agreed period: 9%
- not made in the reporting period due to a dispute: 0%
Payment terms
Shortest standard payment periods
30 days
Longest standard payment period
30 days
Standard payment terms
Our standard payment terms are 30 days from receipt of invoice
Were there any changes to the standard payment terms in the reporting period?
No
Were suppliers notified or consulted about these changes before they were made?
N/A
Maximum contractual payment period agreed
30 days
No further comment provided
Any other information about payment terms
The period of the Payment Practices Reports directly coincides with the implementation of our new P2P system, which went live in September 2025. The P2P process introduced both new systems and procedures that have had a fundamental impact on the way the business process invoices and invoice payments. We expected that, due to these changes, we would see an increase in payments not made by the due date, and we can see that the reports for this period reflect that. We do, however, expect that the next reporting period of April to September 26 will reflect more accurately, the percentage of payments paid on time
Retention clauses
How does this business use retention clauses?
Retention clauses are used in specific circumstances:
Fit out contracts
Does this business only use retention clauses in construction contracts above a specific contract sum?
No
Does this business use a standard percentage rate in retention clauses?
Yes: 5%
Does this business apply retention clause practices that are no more onerous than those applied to it on the same project?
No
Releasing money under a retention clause
Process for releasing money this business has deducted or retained under a retention clause
As part of the invoicing process once works have been satisfactorily completed
Is the money released in stages?
No
Amount retained from suppliers in the reporting period
Amount retained stated as a percentage of the money retained from this business by its clients
0%
Amount retained stated as a percentage of the total construction payments made by this business
0%
Dispute resolution process
Direct discussion between RJWM and the supplier relationship managers. Any escalation in the dispute would ultimately be referred to our internal legal department.
Other payment information
Has this business signed up to a code of conduct or standards on payment practices? If so, which?
For example, signatories to The Fair Payment Code must commit to paying 95% of their invoices within 60 days.
No, this business has not signed up to a code of conduct or standards on payment practices.
Does this business offer e-invoicing in relation to qualifying contracts?
This is where suppliers can electronically submit and track invoices. It's not just allowing suppliers to email them an invoice.
No
Does this business offer supply chain finance?
This is where a supplier who has submitted an invoice can be paid by a third-party finance provider earlier than the agreed payment date. The business would then pay the finance provider the invoiced sum.
No
Under its payment practices and policies, can this business deduct sums from payments under qualifying contracts as a charge for remaining on a supplier list?
No
During the reporting period, did the business deduct sums from payments as a charge for remaining on a supplier list?
No