Published reports

WHITE & CASE LLP

Company number: OC324340

This information is as reported by the business, and responses are in their own words.

Reporting period:

1 July 2025 to 31 December 2025

Report filed on:

9 February 2026

Approved by:

Oliver Brettle


Payment statistics

Average time taken to pay invoices: 29 days

Total value paid:

  • within 30 days: £65,966,218  (72%)
  • in 31 to 60 days: £19,913,724  (22%)
  • in 61 days or more: £5,154,210  (6%)

Invoices paid:

  • within 30 days: 77%
  • in 31 to 60 days: 16%
  • in 61 days or more: 7%

Late and disputed:

  • total value of payments due in the reporting period which have not been paid within the agreed period: £12,637,640
  • payments due in the reporting period which have not been paid within the agreed period: 12%
  • not made in the reporting period due to a dispute: 0%

Payment terms

Shortest standard payment periods

30 days

Longest standard payment period

Answer not provided

Standard payment terms

White & Case’s standard supplier payment terms for non-client contracts state that payment is to be made within 30 days of the supplier issuing an applicable invoice.

Were there any changes to the standard payment terms in the reporting period?

No

Were suppliers notified or consulted about these changes before they were made?

N/A

Maximum contractual payment period agreed

30 days

No further comment provided

Any other information about payment terms

Payment terms for client related suppliers (e.g. barristers, professional services) have not been included on the basis that these are only payable when we receive payment from clients. Additionally, inter-company agreements have also been excluded.

Relating to qualifying construction contracts and retention provisions
The only retention provisions to assess hereunder relate to the London Office Real Estate project.
Construction contracts are governed by W&C's standard terms and conditions. Retention clauses are not embedded in standard payment terms or procurement templates, but are included only in qualifying construction contracts where appropriate given the nature of the works, reflecting standard construction industry practice. They provide assurance that defects, snagging items, and outstanding works are satisfactorily completed and rectified, with retention amounts released upon practical completion and expiry of the defects' rectification period.
Retention clauses are applied based on the risk profile, nature and complexity of works, not a fixed contract value threshold. Retention percentages are set out in individual contracts and reflect market-standard construction practice, not a firm-wide standard. Where Joint Contracts Tribunal ("JCT") standard forms are used, retention percentages align with standard market norms (e.g., expressed as a percentage of interim payments, released in stages), with precise percentages agreed on a contract-by-contract basis.
Retention clauses are not drafted to be more onerous than market-standard provisions and are consistent with those White & Case would reasonably accept under comparable arrangements. They follow recognised industry norms, are limited in scope and duration to completion and defect-rectification assurance, and White & Case does not impose enhanced, punitive, or asymmetric provisions on suppliers.
Each contract is reviewed to ensure retention provisions remain proportionate, commercially reasonable, and aligned with prevailing market practice. Retention amounts are released following the standard JCT process: staged release with a portion at practical completion and the balance following expiry of the defects liability period, once outstanding defects or snagging items have been satisfactorily addressed. There are no departures from standard JCT terms in the qualifying contract.
a) Retention withheld from suppliers as a % of retention withheld by clients: N/A. W&C LLP (UK) is not subject to retention withheld by clients under qualifying construction contracts during the reporting period.
b) Retention withheld from suppliers as a % of gross payments to suppliers: 0%. No retention was withheld from suppliers under qualifying construction contracts during the reporting period.

Dispute resolution process

White & Case shall notify the supplier of the dispute within 30 days of invoice receipt and White & Case will be only obligated to pay the undisputed portion of the bill until a mutually acceptable outcome has been reached between the parties or the dispute has been settled through the courts of England.

When a supplier complains about payment under a qualifying contract or a payment dispute arises, a Global Sourcing and Procurement Team member or the key White & Case contact as identified in the contract will liaise with the supplier to discuss and rectify the issue. If, in the unlikely situation, a resolution cannot be agreed, the discussions will need to be elevated to senior members of both parties. A thorough review of the contract, purchase order, invoice, and any other pertinent information will be conducted to understand all elements of the complaint or payment dispute. The Global Sourcing and Procurement Team will lead these discussions and work swiftly to ensure a mutual resolution is achieved.

Other payment information

Has this business signed up to a code of conduct or standards on payment practices? If so, which?

For example, signatories to The Fair Payment Code must commit to paying 95% of their invoices within 60 days.

No, this business has not signed up to a code of conduct or standards on payment practices.

Does this business offer e-invoicing in relation to qualifying contracts?

This is where suppliers can electronically submit and track invoices. It's not just allowing suppliers to email them an invoice.

No

Does this business offer supply chain finance?

This is where a supplier who has submitted an invoice can be paid by a third-party finance provider earlier than the agreed payment date. The business would then pay the finance provider the invoiced sum.

No

Under its payment practices and policies, can this business deduct sums from payments under qualifying contracts as a charge for remaining on a supplier list?

No

During the reporting period, did the business deduct sums from payments as a charge for remaining on a supplier list?

No